Do farmers prefer result-based, hybrid or practice-based agri-environmental schemes?

Jared Gars, Santiago Guerrero, Laure Kuhfuss and Jussi Lankoski
Additional contact information
Jared Gars: UF - University of Florida [Gainesville]
Santiago Guerrero: UCU - Universidad Católica del Uruguay [Montevideo, Uruguay]
Jussi Lankoski: Agrifood Research Finland, OECD

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This study examines farmers' preferences for practice-based, result-based and hybrid agri-environmental schemes in three countries through a choice experiment conducted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, focusing on biodiversity, climate and water quality. The results reveal that, in general, farmers tend to prefer practice-based schemes for water quality or climate change mitigation goals over hybrid or result-based schemes. Moreover, the study indicates that only a limited number of hybrid schemes are both preferred by farmers and more socially beneficial compared to equivalent practice- or result-based schemes. These conclusions are further reinforced by a cost-benefit analysis.

Date: 2024-07-13
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2024, 51 (3), pp.644-689. ⟨10.1093/erae/jbae017⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Do farmers prefer result-based, hybrid or practice-based agri-environmental schemes? (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04819346

DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbae017

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().