Performance measurement systems and CSR: Comparison of models for sustainable management

Systèmes de mesure de la performance et RSE: Comparaison des modèles pour une gestion durable Performance measurement systems and CSR: Comparison of models for sustainable management

Wafa Fkihi, Badr Touzi and Fadwa Farchi
Additional contact information
Wafa Fkihi: (LARCEPEM) - Laboratoire de Recherche en Compétitivité Economique et Performance Managériale (LARCEPEM)Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en performance et Compétitivité Faculté des Sciences Juridiques Economiques et Sociales – Souissi Université Mohammed V- Rabat. Maroc
Badr Touzi: (LARCEPEM) - Laboratoire de Recherche en Compétitivité Economique et Performance Managériale (LARCEPEM) Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en performance et Compétitivité Faculté des Sciences Juridiques Economiques et Socia
Fadwa Farchi: Laboratoire d’Ingénierie Mécanique, Management Industriel et Innovation Faculté des Sciences et Techniques Université Hassan 1er de Settat, Maroc

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In a world where environmental and social issues are gaining prominence, it is crucial for entities to reassess their managerial strategies in pursuit of organizational performance; the paradigm of sustainable development thus emerges as an essential framework for integrating new practices to ensure the sustainability of organizations. In this context, the notion of performance becomes vague, polysemous, and difficult to grasp. Today, it is no longer limited to financial concerns; it now includes other economic, social, and environmental issues. Therefore, it is necessary for organizations to review their performance measurement systems. The issue of performance measurement has become an essential management tool for organizations opting for sustainable development strategies. Thus, the main objective of this article is to analyze and compare different performance measurement models, including the Balanced Scorecard, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Management by Objectives (MBO), and Six Sigma, in order to assess their relevance and effectiveness within the framework of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and sustainable management. Methodologically, this traditional literature review aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each model through a comparative analysis of four key aspects of performance measurement systems: effectiveness, ease of implementation, scope, and impact on organizational culture. The data is based on qualitative and quantitative assessments, with ratings ranging from 1 to 5. The results provide a comprehensive view of the suitability of each system to specific organizational needs and pave the way for new research perspectives on theoretical and practical approaches in the field of organizational management aimed at establishing systems for measuring sustainable organizational performance.

Keywords: Sustainable development; PMS.; Développement durable; Performance; SMP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-12-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04838650v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 2024, 5 (11), pp.627-639. ⟨10.5281/zenodo.14253405⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04838650v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04838650

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14253405

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().