Do Google Reviews matter for doctors? Unpacking online emotional accountability on a digital platform

Agathe Morinière, Irène Georgescu () and Sea Matilda Bez ()
Additional contact information
Agathe Morinière: EM - EMLyon Business School
Irène Georgescu: MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier, UM - Université de Montpellier
Sea Matilda Bez: MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier, UM - Université de Montpellier

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The emergence of publicly available online feedback has prompted inquiries into the evolving context of professional evaluation, especially in the healthcare sector. Drawing on Illouz's critical theory of emotional capitalism, this article unravels whether and how patients' Google feedback changes the way doctors are held accountable. We draw on a qualitative analysis of Google's patient feedback that is combined, when available, with doctors' responses, coupled with 13 interviews with medical professionals and members of their administrative staff. Our contributions lie in conceptualising this Google online feedback as a form of 'online emotional accountability', a crucial characterisation that extends the current understanding of the phenomenon of online feedback for professionals. It sheds new light on a pivotal shift in which informal discussions about doctors' behaviour and patients' emotional satisfaction are made publicly available, placing professionals-especially doctors-under public scrutiny not only for their expertise but also for their role in managing the diverse emotional needs and expectations of their patients. Our findings uncover four critical implications of this online emotional accountability from a doctors' perspective: (1) the feigned indifference; (2) the critiques of the commodification of medical work; (3) the potential competing goals between achieving patient emotional satisfaction and respecting professional ethics; and (4) the challenges of addressing patients' feedback under public scrutiny.

Keywords: Emotional accountability; Online accountability; Professional evaluation; Reviews; Emotion Healthcare; Patient feedback; Digital platform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-06
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04877302v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 2025, 101, pp.102768. ⟨10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102768⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04877302v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04877302

DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102768

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().