A comparative analysis of risk prevention policy tools and governance structures in Normandy (France) and Victoria (Australia): Assessing policies for high-risk sites
Scarlett Tannous (),
Myriam Merad () and
Jan Hayes ()
Additional contact information
Scarlett Tannous: Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, LAMSADE - Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Myriam Merad: LAMSADE - Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Jan Hayes: RMIT University - Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
High-risk industrial sites are classified as the most dangerous sites for their risk of inducing damage in case of an accident, even if it is rare. Risk policies are one way to prevent damage while balancing other trade-offs. How can public authorities assess "risk policy systems" of high-risk sites in specific administrative regimes for an effective decision process taking into consideration different jurisdictions? This paper investigates the Normandy and Victorian risk policy system in France and Australia, respectively, based on qualitative approaches. By investigating two cases and fostering conceptual thinking, two assessment criteria are highlighted by different stakeholders to determine an effective risk policy. For instance, beyond the common focus on the efficiency and efficacy of risk policies, findings revealed the importance of "dialogue, participation, and cooperation" between actors and "adaptivity, flexibility, relevance, and coherence" of different tools and legal texts. Limitations and further work include testing and iterating on other assessment criteria to propose an adapted assessment framework for high-risk policies.
Keywords: Public policy analysis; Risk policy and regulation; Risk governance; Policy tools; High-risk organizations; Major risks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04877609v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 110, ⟨10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104600⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04877609v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04877609
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104600
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().