The impact of frequency and magnitude of natural disasters on inventory prepositioning

Keyvan Fardi, Fatemeh Ghasemzadeh, Reza Zanjirani Farahani, Nasrin Asgari, Benjamin Laker and Rubén Ruiz
Additional contact information
Keyvan Fardi: ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business
Fatemeh Ghasemzadeh: ZNU - University of Zanjan
Reza Zanjirani Farahani: ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business
Nasrin Asgari: ARU - Anglia Ruskin University
Benjamin Laker: Henley Business School [University of Reading] - UOR - University of Reading
Rubén Ruiz: UPV - Universitat Politècnica de València = Universitad Politecnica de Valencia = Polytechnic University of Valencia

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Natural disasters have been adversely affecting human societies for many centuries. One effective strategy in preparation for a timely response to such disasters is inventory prepositioning. Holding the right amount of inventory is critical in minimizing the social and economic impact and cost. Scholars usually model such problems assuming common Probability Density Functions (PDFs) like Normal, Poisson, and Exponential to simplify calculations. Following Gumbel's studies regarding ‘‘the nature of nature'' and exploring the nature of extreme events, in this research, we address the following research questions: first, do the magnitude and timing of natural disasters follow specific PDFs? Second, how can unrealistic assumptions affect such disasters' economic and social costs of such disasters? Third, how should researchers and practitioners correct their assumptions when modeling inventory prepositioning? To answer these questions, we design a semi-Markovian model for an (S,s) inventory system that considers the magnitude and the timing of disasters for general PDFs. The model is an inventory system that considers the magnitude and the timing of disasters for general PDFs. The model is analytically solved and tested with real data from 1996 to 2019 regarding typhoons in Florida and earthquakes in California. Our findings show that correct assumptions about the time between disasters are far more critical than the disaster's magnitude regarding the resulting social and economic costs. In this respect, we can summarize our findings as follows: (1) if the maximum inventory level (S) depends only on the average demand, the impact of assumed PDFs is insignificant; (2) if S depends on both the average and standard deviation (STD) of demand, the impact of the employed PDFs is significant; and (3) the STD is the main factor influenced by the type of the PDF.

Keywords: Humanitarian logistics; Disaster management; Inventory management; Prepositioning; Markov models; Probability theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in European Journal of Operational Research, 2025, 322 (2), pp.511-540. ⟨10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.038⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04916649

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.038

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().