Lay Theories of Expertise: A Mixed-Methods Exploration

Lauren A. Keating () and Benjamin W. Walker
Additional contact information
Lauren A. Keating: EM - EMLyon Business School
Benjamin W. Walker: Victoria University of Wellington

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Failure to engage with expertise underpins many organizational and societal problems. Despite decades of research on expertise, we still do not fully understand why such failures persist, and there is a sense that these failures are becoming a crisis of expertise. In this article, we highlight a person's system of beliefs about the meaning of expertise – what we term their lay theory of expertise (LTE) – as an important factor for understanding their engagement with expertise. Through a free response study (Study 1), analysis of social media data (Study 2), and word sorting study (Study 3), we first develop a taxonomy of common LTE elements. We then examine how LTEs affect expert recognition via two experiments with managers (Studies 4 and 5). Study 4 reveals that congruence between the most psychologically active element of a person's lay theory and expert conduct is conducive to expert recognition, while Study 5 highlights that (in)congruence between LTEs and expert conduct can alter how other mental representations (such as gender stereotypes) shape expert recognition. Our work provides a conceptual foundation for exploring variation in the subjective meaning of expertise in future research on expert recognition and engagement, both within and beyond organizations.

Keywords: evidence-based; expertise; experts; expert recognition; grand challenges; lay theories; lay theories of expertise (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-01-16
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Management Studies, inPress, 39 p. ⟨10.1111/joms.13188⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04964896

DOI: 10.1111/joms.13188

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().