Do Risk Preferences Really Matter? The Case of Input Use in Agriculture

Christophe Bontemps, Douadia Bougherara and Celine Nauges ()
Additional contact information
Celine Nauges: TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Farmers' main reasons for using pesticides are, first, to increase the expected value of crop yields and, second, to insure against the risk of production variability. Using simulated data, we show that, under fairly representative conditions on the technology and risk preferences, the increase in expected yield is the primary driver of pesticide use. For moderate to high risk-averse farmers, only 5 to 15% of the optimal input use is devoted to risk management. This calls for a tax on pesticide to be preferred to insurance premium subsidisation if the aim is to incentivise farmers to reduce pesticide use.

Date: 2019-06-24
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in LEEP Institute's Meeting of International Excellence in Environmental and Resource Economics,, EAERE, Jun 2019, Exter, United Kingdom

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04971967

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().