Is AI taking generativity further? An explorative study using the mirroring hypothesis

Antoine Bordas (), Alexandre Azoulay () and Gouthanan Pushpananthan ()
Additional contact information
Antoine Bordas: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres
Alexandre Azoulay: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Gouthanan Pushpananthan: LIU - Linköping University

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper explores how Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) reshapes organizational architectures and creative work through the lens of the mirroring hypothesis. While GenAI systems are often celebrated for their generative capacities, their actual impact on innovation and organizational structures remains underexplored. Drawing on the mirroring hypothesis, which posits a structural isomorphism between technologies, tasks, and knowledge, we propose a conceptual framework mapping how di erent types of GenAI (agnostic, holistic, and specialized) reconfigure organizational architectures. We identify key mechanisms through which GenAI augments, excludes, ports, or substitutes both tasks and knowledge. This conceptual development is supported by an empirical illustration in the healthcare industry, where GenAI was used to accelerate mobile app code migration. The case reveals not only productivity gains but also a deep reconfiguration of developer roles and organizational routines. We formulate hypotheses on how GenAI's architectural nature and the characteristics of organizational knowledge influence task reorganization. Ultimately, we argue that GenAI's generativity lies less in its computational novelty and more in its ability to enable new organizational combinations. This work contributes to understanding the co-evolution of AI systems and organizational design, and extends the mirroring hypothesis to the context of generative technologies.

Keywords: Generative AI; Mirroring Hypothesis; Creative Work; Organizationnal Design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-06-30
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04996911v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2025 R&D Management Conference, Jun 2025, Pise, Italy

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04996911v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04996911

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().