EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Influence of Formal and Informal Ethical Systems on Employees’ Unethical Decisions

Clara Koetz and Sarah Hudson
Additional contact information
Clara Koetz: Rennes SB - Rennes School of Business
Sarah Hudson: Rennes SB - Rennes School of Business

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper examines the effect of formal (e.g., codes of conduct [COC] and punishment) and informal (e.g., peer behavior) ethical systems on employees' unethical intentions. Previous studies disagree about the effectiveness of COC and punishment policies on individuals' unethical intentions. Moreover, there is not much research regarding the interactive effects of formal and informal norms in organizations on unethical behavior and how employees decide when there is incongruence between formal and informal ethical systems. To investigate this, we propose the following research question: What is the effect of distinct formal (implicit and explicit COC and strong and weak punishment policies) and informal (peers' ethical and unethical behaviors) ethical systems on individuals' unethical decisions? The results of an exploratory qualitative study (N = 275) and an experimental study (N = 374) demonstrate that (1) peer behavior has the strongest effect on individuals' unethical intentions; (2) punishment and clear COC combined are effective in reducing unethical intentions when peers behave unethically; however, in these contexts, rules are ineffective when not supported by punishment policies, and punishment can be counterproductive when rules are implicit or nonexistent. Our study contributes to the literature on ethical decision-making by showing how combinations of formal and informal ethical systems influence unethical intentions. It also offers valuable recommendations to managers on reducing unethical behavior in companies.

Keywords: Formal and informal ethical systems; Formal and informal ethical systems Social norms Ethical decision making Punishment; Punishment; Ethical decision making; Social norms; Ethical Perceptions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-02-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-soc
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05104973v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in M@n@gement, 2025, pp.e9727. ⟨10.37725/mgmt.2025.9727⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05104973v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05104973

DOI: 10.37725/mgmt.2025.9727

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-12-06
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05104973