Back to the future of industrial research: Early double-impact research at General Electric, AT&T and DuPont (1902–1948)
Sylvain Lenfle and
Pascal Le Masson ()
Additional contact information
Sylvain Lenfle: LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - Cnam - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam], CRG I3 - Centre de recherche en gestion I3 - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Pascal Le Masson: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
After the corporate research bloodbath that occurred in the 1990s, there was a need for firms to reinvent the management of corporate research. Although several explanations exist for how corporate research can fail, management science lacks models that can account for successful management. This paper addresses this gap by proposing such a model. Methodologically, this paper adopts a historical approach because it is particularly adaptable to a) assessing success on clearly evaluated facts at several time horizons and b) using rich, longitudinal, well-controlled data related to how management occurred in the past. This paper thus discusses the strategic role and inner functioning of corporate research at General Electric, AT&T Bell Labs and DuPont. These four cases demonstrate that successful corporate research can be attributed to the existence of simultaneous and bidirectional links between corporate research, strategy, new product development and the scientific community. These sixfold links constitute conditions for corporate research that are strategically and scientifically relevant. The results show that, contrary to widespread belief, 1) research is carefully integrated into the firm's strategy, and 2) GE, AT&T and DuPont provide examples of the fruitful interaction between fundamental research and new product development that leads to new products and scientific breakthroughs. The present paper thus contributes to the ongoing debates on the role and management of corporate research, particularly "double-impact" research.
Keywords: Corporate research; New product development; Strategy; GE; AT&T; DuPont; Double-impact research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Technovation, 2025, 145, pp.103238. ⟨10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103238⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05126248
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103238
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().