What one thinks, what one says and what one does: Male justifications and practices of gender-based violence in Mali

Olivia Bertelli, Thomas Calvo, Emmanuelle Lavallée, Marion Mercier and Sandrine Mesplé-Somps
Additional contact information
Emmanuelle Lavallée: LEDA-DIAL - Développement, Institutions et Modialisation - LEDa - Laboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Sandrine Mesplé-Somps: LEDA-DIAL - Développement, Institutions et Modialisation - LEDa - Laboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Gender-based violence (GBV) is widespread across the world. While the majority of the literature focuses on women as the victims of GBV, this paper studies men's justifications for and perpetration of GBV in Mali, one of the countries with the highest GBV prevalence rates in the world. We elicit the prevalence of eight GBV-related opinions and behaviors among men in Bamako, the capital city, by administering a set of list experiments that we compare to a set of direct questions to estimate response biases. We find large support for GBV: nearly one respondent in two supports female genital mutilation or intimate partner violence. Besides, one in four has already physically hit an adult woman. Our results also show that several questions suffer from significant response biases when asked directly. Support for female genital mutilation is overreported, with actual approval being lower than openly stated. Conversely, justification of intimate partner violence is underreported, likely due to social pressure against it. While response bias varies little with respondent characteristics, prevalence rates are systematically lower among men with a secondary level of education. Our results are in line with response bias being shaped by the legal framework addressing GBV as well as prevailing social norms, highlighting the need for caution when using data collected through direct questioning.

Keywords: Gender-based violence; List experiment; Mali (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-04-17
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05151276v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Journal of Development Economics, 2025, 176, pp.103479. ⟨10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103479⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05151276v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: What one thinks, what one says and what one does: Male justifications and practices of gender-based violence in Mali (2025)
Working Paper: What one thinks, what one says and what one does: male justifications and practices of gender-based violence in Mali (2024)
Working Paper: What one thinks, what one says and what one does: male justifications and practices of gender-based violence in Mali (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05151276

DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103479

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().