Differentiated early performance of Bt cotton: Case in Burkina Faso
Performance différenciée du coton Bt en début de diffusion: cas du Burkina Faso
Gaspard Vognan and
Michel Fok ()
Additional contact information
Gaspard Vognan: INERA - Institut de l'Environnement et Recherches Agricoles [Ouagadougou] - CNRST - Centre national de la recherche scientifique et technologique [Ouagadougou]
Michel Fok: UPR AIDA - Agroécologie et intensification durables des cultures annuelles - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The economic benefit of transgenic crops for producers in developing countries remains a matter of concern and controversy. Only a few studies have taken into account differences between producers to understand the variable effects of transgenic crops, particularly in the case of Bt cotton incorporating Bacillus thuringiensis genes for resistance to certain cotton pests. Our assessment study deals with Burkina Faso where the large-scale release of Bt cotton occurred in 2009, and was then suspended in 2016. It addresses the cultivation practices of producers, in farms differentiated by their level of ox-drawn equipment, on the first year of Bt cotton large adoption and dissemination of recommendations for an adapted insecticide protection. We found that Bt cotton increased yields, but to a lesser extent than expected; moreover, an increase in profitability was only observed in farms with a good ox-drawn equipment (the healthiest ones), but not for the others representing 58% of all farms. This is the result of worst-off producers' strategies, consisting in reducing cash expenses in fertilizers and insecticide, which were further exacerbated by the high price of Bt cottonseeds. The case study points out that the early impacts of a new technology depend on its price and on taking into account, or not, the behaviour of the poorest producers.
Keywords: Burkina Faso; Gossypium; organisme génétiquement modifié; rentabilité; rendement des cultures; exploitation agricole; moyen de production agricole; économie de production; Bacillus thuringiensis; Biotechnologies; Pratiques culturales; Rentabilité; Différenciation des exploitations; OGM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05174512v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Cahiers Agricultures, 2019, 28, pp.26. ⟨10.1051/cagri/2019026⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05174512v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05174512
DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2019026
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().