Portfolio optimisation under prospect theory with an empirical test

N. Sensoy, S. Sozekici and H. Sak ()
Additional contact information
H. Sak: Audencia Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Barberis et al. (2016. "Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: An Empirical Test." The Review of Financial Studies 29:3068–3107. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw049.) show that a stock whose past return distribution has a high (low) prospect theory value (TK) earns a low (high) subsequent return on average. In this paper, we investigate whether portfolio optimisation techniques can make high-TK stocks (both long and short positions) more appealing to investors. Following the literature, we remove the probability distortion part of prospect theory to find a closed-form solution under the well-justified assumptions of a piecewise exponential value function and normally distributed returns for multiple risky assets in a single-period setting. We show that the optimal portfolio is proportional to the well-known Markowitz mean–variance portfolio. Our numerical results demonstrate that our portfolio optimisation approach yields higher subsequent gains for groups of stocks with high TK and lower gains for those with low TK in the US market. TK at the portfolio level is an important driver of portfolio returns under our optimisation approach, even after controlling for well-established stock return predictors, and it negatively affects portfolio returns.

Keywords: Portfolio optimisation; cumulative prospect theory; portfolio prospect theory value; time-series and cross-sectional tests (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-09
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05262162v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in European Journal of Finance, 2025, ⟨10.1080/1351847X.2025.2553048⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05262162

DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2025.2553048

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().