Standard of proof and volume of litigation: A comparative perspective

Edwige Fain ()
Additional contact information
Edwige Fain: GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper explores the effect of the standard of proof on the level of litigation. A comparative perspective is adopted to study the consequences of the high standard applying in the civil law tradition as opposed to the low standard (preponderance of evidence) applicable in the common law tradition. To this end, I build on the canonical asymmetric information model, further assuming that a stronger standard of proof decreases the plaintiff's probability of success at trial. With this interpretation, the suit and the settlement probabilities are shown to decrease as the standard of proof becomes more rigorous, everything else being equal. Thus, the analysis suggests that the standard of proof may be part of the explanation for differences in litigation activity patterns across countries.

Date: 2017-10-26
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05263550v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Economics Bulletin, 2017, 37 (4), pp.2434-2445

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05263550v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05263550

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().