Conflicting Consumer Beliefs Influencing Eco‐Innovation Adoption: Motives and Barriers for Accepting the Laser Marking of Organic Products

Jean Pfiffelmann (), Olga Untilov (), John Thøgersen and Romain Franck
Additional contact information
Jean Pfiffelmann: EM Strasbourg - École de Management de Strasbourg = EM Strasbourg Business School - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg, Humanis - Hommes et management en société / Humans and management in society - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg
Olga Untilov: Audencia Business School
John Thøgersen: Aarhus University [Aarhus]
Romain Franck: IÉSEG School Of Management [Puteaux]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In response to regulatory requirements and consumer demand for sustainable products, producers of organic products are beginning to use laser marking to reduce packaging and, thereby, packaging waste. However, the consumer responses to this "high‐tech" eco‐innovation remain unexplored. Using a mixed‐method approach, we collected qualitative and quantitative data on responses to the laser marking of organic products from 328 French participants. Guided by the theory of consumption values and innovation resistance theory, we conducted a thematic analysis of answers to an open‐ended question which probed consumers' motives for and barriers to adopting laser marking. The most frequently stated motive was ecological benefits, and the most reported barriers were risks and tradition. Structural equation modeling revealed that attitudes toward laser‐marked organic products are positively impacted by social, emotional, and functional values and are negatively impacted by barriers related to images and emotions. Consumers' attitudes toward laser‐marked organic products strongly affect their willingness to buy such products. To increase the acceptance of laser marking, managers and policymakers should mitigate false‐negative consumer perceptions, including doubts about its eco‐friendliness and safety, thereby facilitating greater acceptance of this eco‐innovation.

Keywords: Theory of consumption values; Organic labeling; Mixed‐method design; Laser marking; Innovation resistance theory; Eco‐innovation adoption (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-11-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Psychology and Marketing, 2024, 42 (3), pp.866-891. ⟨10.1002/mar.22156⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05268941

DOI: 10.1002/mar.22156

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().