Why consumers react differently to brand transgressions: Functional vs. ethical breaches and psychological contracts

Sophie de Villartay (), Eric Julienne (), Marie-Eve Laporte () and Fabienne Berger-Remy ()
Additional contact information
Sophie de Villartay: LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne
Eric Julienne: LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne
Marie-Eve Laporte: RITM - Réseaux Innovation Territoires et Mondialisation - Université Paris-Saclay
Fabienne Berger-Remy: Equipe de Recherche en Marketing & Stratégie - DRM ERMES - DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Brand transgressions are increasingly common, but their effects on consumer behavior remain inconsistent. While some incidents lead to negative word-of-mouth without affecting sales, others cause a decline in purchasing behavior. Existing literature does not fully explain the divergence in consumer responses. This study investigates how consumers react to functional versus ethical brand transgressions through the lens of psychological contract theory. Drawing on a survey of 862 participants and using structural equation modeling, we examine the mechanisms underlying consumer reactions to breaches of brand promises. Our findings identify two mechanisms: withdrawal, primarily triggered by functional breaches, and indignation, associated with ethical breaches that generate negative word-of-mouth. This research expands psychological contract theory beyond functional failures and demonstrates its relevance in ethical contexts. The results underscore the importance of understanding how consumers interpret a transgression and of tailoring brand responses accordingly.

Keywords: Structural equation modeling; Reputation crisis; Negative word-of-mouth; Psychological contract; Brand promise breach; Brand transgression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2026, 88, pp.104565. ⟨10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104565⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05318370

DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104565

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().