How do rights revolutions occur? Free speech and the First Amendment

Daniel L. Chen () and Susan Yeh
Additional contact information
Daniel L. Chen: TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Susan Yeh: Charles River Associates Inc, Boston

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Does obscenity law affect moral values and does it matter? Using random judge assignment and all U.S. obscenity precedents since 1958, we report four key findings. Democratic judges, more than Republicans, tended to vote progressively in obscenity cases. Such progressive rulings liberalized sexual attitudes and behaviors, increased asymptomatic STDs, but reduced child abuse. The media played a role in transferring legal precedents onto societal values. These results support a model positing laws not only sanction activities but also shape societal norms, especially when these activities become prevalent.

Keywords: Cultural change; Expressive law; Law and norms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Social Science Research, 2025, 128, pp.103155. ⟨10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103155⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05330086

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103155

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().