EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Stimulants of behavioural change: accounting education schism and gender

R. Nehme, C. Alkhoury () and A. Alharbi
Additional contact information
C. Alkhoury: Audencia Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to identify differences in auditors' behaviour who have undergone work-integrated learning (WIL) versus the classical accounting education. Design/methodology/approach In addition to the education factor, auditors' perception is assessed in scenarios when facing time budget pressure and time deadline pressure. The gender factor is included to highlight any behavioural differences between male and female auditors. Senior auditors working at the Big Four firms in the UK have participated in this survey. Findings The results show, from an educational perspective, that traditional accounting program is perceived as a catalyst of dysfunctional audit behaviour in comparison to WIL program that demonstrated a higher degree of ethicality. Furthermore, the results identify male auditors as having more tendency to behaving dysfunctionally when compared to their female counterparts. Practical implications This paper goes beyond assessing auditors' ethical actions under work-related stresses, to identifying the differences in their behaviour based on their academic background. It can be used as a tool for audit practitioners and accounting faculty by highlighting the factors leading to dysfunctional behaviour and trying to mitigate them. Originality/value The added value of the research paper is that it sheds light on one of the most issues faced by auditors and employees in general. Time pressures embedded in most businesses can harm organizations badly in relation to the behaviour of their employees.

Keywords: Here you go:; Auditors’ behaviour; Work-integrated learning (WIL); Classical learning; Time pressures; Gender (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Accounting Research Journal, 2022, ⟨10.1108/ARJ-05-2021-0145⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05367260

DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-05-2021-0145

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-11-18
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05367260