Tradition monétaire, approche réelle: la séparation est-elle insurmontable?

Nicolas Piluso () and Raphaël Porcherot ()
Additional contact information
Nicolas Piluso: CERTOP - Centre d'Etude et de Recherche Travail Organisation Pouvoir - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse, IUT Toulouse Auch Castres - Institut Universitaire de Technologie - Paul Sabatier - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse
Raphaël Porcherot: IDHES - Institutions et Dynamiques Historiques de l'Économie et de la Société - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - UP8 - Université Paris 8 - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - ENS Paris Saclay - Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, ACT - Analyse des Crises et Transitions - LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPCité - Université Paris Cité - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article aims to clarify the differences and similarities between the real and monetary approaches to economic theory, which Schumpeter and Cartelier identify as the two main branches. First, we demonstrate that the unsuccessful attempts to synthesise the work of Sraffa and Keynes, or Marx and Keynes, are undoubtedly linked to the irreconcilable nature of these authors' initial postulates and hypotheses. Sraffa and Marx, on the one hand, and Keynes, on the other, belong to opposing traditions. However, an analysis of certain works belonging to the real approach reveals affinities with the monetary approach. The asymmetry hypothesis between entrepreneurs and employees, analysis of imbalances and the status of money as a necessary intermediary in exchanges are not exclusive to the monetary tradition.

Keywords: wage asymmetry; Imbalance; Currency; Price; value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue d'histoire de la pensée économique, inPress

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05456936

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().