Financial Performance and the Management Issues of Bumiputera Construction Firms in the Malaysian Construction Industry

Mohd Suberi Ab Halim, Md. Shariff M Haniff, Mohd Zukime Mat Junoh and Abdullah Osman
Additional contact information
Mohd Suberi Ab Halim: School of Business Innovation and Technopreneurship, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Malaysia.
Md. Shariff M Haniff: Faculty of Business Management, MARA University of Technology (UiTM), Malaysia.
Mohd Zukime Mat Junoh: School of Business Innovation and Technopreneurship, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Malaysia.
Abdullah Osman: School of Business Innovation and Technopreneurship, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Malaysia.

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Aims: Financial factors are significantly related to the performance of construction firms. Moreover, total failure of the construction firms is higher than the percentage of failures of firms in other industries. Therefore, this study was conducted to achieve three objectives. First, this study identifies the failure factors of Bumiputera contractors by using ratio analysis. For this analysis, four financial variables were chosen, which are capital liquidity, profitability, debt, and the efficiency of financial management/assets. The second objective identifies the causes of failure associated with the four financial variables. The third objective identifies the elements of effective financial management. Methodology: To achieve these objectives, data collection involved the use of qualitative (ratio analysis and interviews) and quantitative (questionnaire) research methods that led to the concept of triangulation. Respondents to the qualitative study consisted of 6 Bumiputera construction firms, while the quantitative data had 54 respondents. Findings: The findings of the analysis showed the firms had shortage of capital to finance projects, received small profit from construction projects, carried higher debt, and were less efficient in asset management. The study confirmed that capital problems experienced by the firms resulted from the small capital at the start of their business, and the late payment from the clients (progress and final payment). Small profit margin was due to the increase in the prices of building materials, low price of contracts, and delays in project completion. Analysis showed that the higher debt of firms was caused by delays of the payment of the project owner, small capital base, and late receipt of advance payments. Moreover, asset management of the firm was said to be less efficient due to the level of ownership of fixed assets at a higher rate, and the improper management of cash flow. Conclusion: It was observed that construction companies put themselves up for failure without effective financial practices.

Date: 2014-03-28
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 2014, 3 (9), pp.1190-1202

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05468636

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().