EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Subsidies and rebound effect with incomplete carbon pricing: An application to biogas and livestock

Subventions et effet de rebond dans le cadre d'une tarification incomplète du carbone: application au biogaz et à l'élevage

Guy Meunier () and Victor Besnier
Additional contact information
Guy Meunier: UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Victor Besnier: UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Bioenergies from dedicated crops or wood have faced substantial criticisms due to their significant land requirements. Certain bioenergy pathways, such as biogas generated from crop residues, manure, or food waste, appear to be exempt from this criticism. However, these feedstocks are byproducts of agricultural activities that generate emissions not covered by current climate policies in most countries. We analyze the optimal biogas subsidy in a second-best framework featuring food–energy market interactions and incomplete pricing of emissions from food production and fossil natural gas. We show analytically how the indirect effect of the biogas subsidy on food production should be taken into account, as well as the welfare implications. We provide numerical simulations calibrated on the French dairy market and anaerobic digestion of livestock manure. We compare a second-best situation in which dairy emissions are not taxed with a first-best situation in which they are taxed. This illustration indicates that for a small Social Cost of Carbon, the rebound effect on milk production is moderate, and the optimal subsidy departs from the Pigouvian one accordingly. The second-best quantity of biogas is slightly larger than the first-best one. For a large Social Cost of Carbon, the rebound effect is important, and the gap between the first-best and second-best widens considerably.

Keywords: Climate policy; Second-best policy; Rebound effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Energy Economics, 2026, 153, pp.109070. ⟨10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109070⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05488550

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109070

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-02-10
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05488550