Measuring social norms: direct and indirect methods and the role of financial incentives in reducing misreporting

Ann-Kristin Reitmann (), Clotilde Mahé, Micheline Goedhuys and Eleonora Nillesen
Additional contact information
Ann-Kristin Reitmann: CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universität Passau [Passau], Leibniz Universität Hannover = Leibniz University Hannover
Clotilde Mahé: VU - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam], Amsterdam Institute for Global Health & Development [Amsterdam, The Netherlands]
Micheline Goedhuys: Maastricht University [Maastricht]
Eleonora Nillesen: Maastricht University [Maastricht]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We test two common features of the opinion-matching method to elicit personal beliefs and perceived social norms regarding female labor force participation among a sample of young Tunisian men and women. Our survey experiment contains two orthogonal treatment arms. In the first treatment arm, respondents were randomly assigned to answer a direct question about their personal beliefs regarding women working outside the home and an indirect questioning technique that provides more cover for the respondent: the list experiment. We find significant discrepancies between the two, particularly among male respondents -suggesting either biased personal beliefs in the direct question or non-strategic misreporting in the list experiment. It follows that, depending on which method is deemed more credible and which gender sample is considered, the prevalence of pluralistic ignorance varies widely in our setting. For the second treatment arm, we provided half of our sample with a financial incentive when eliciting perceived social norms regarding the appropriateness of women working. We find that financial incentives are necessary for both men and women to distinguish their personal beliefs from their perception of what others believe.

Keywords: List experiment; Opinion-matching method; Female labor force participation; Social norms; Survey experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05496799v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2026, 243, pp.107465. ⟨10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107465⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05496799v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05496799

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107465

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().