The decoupling of extra-financial materiality assessment practices: Study of cooperative and shareholder banks

Emmanuelle Flores () and Véronique Blum ()
Additional contact information
Emmanuelle Flores: CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE]
Véronique Blum: UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Materiality analyses seek to identify the significant information that needs to be further explored in communications with stakeholders (Beske et al., 2020). Information is considered material if its omission or inaccuracy can affect the economic, social and environmental decisions of users (Edgley, 2014), the link is significant with strategy, risk and long-term value creation (Cerbone et Maroun, 2020 ; Font et al., 2016). Materiality analyses has become a requirement with the adoption of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD 2022/2464/EU). Hence, there should exist an alignment between the areas that are identified as areas where the reporting entity has impact and the content of the extra-financial disclosures. In what manner are the results of a materiality assessment and the entity's extra-financialdisclosures aligned ? To answer that question, we conduct a multiple case study, where we examine the extrafinancial disclosures and their practices within the framework of materiality analyses in a cooperative banking context, the « Banques Populaires » in France. We conduct a review ofmateriality practices through a panel of cooperative and shareholder banks. Our results highlight a typology of three different behaviors. « Decoupled » communication is observed when the companies declare that they are following the process but the evidence are not disclosed or remain laconic. « Discretionary » communication occurs when the banks have undertaken a materiality assessment process, but do not disclose in detail all the methodological aspects and/or do not implement all the steps of the analysis. Finally, « Proactive... but improvable » communication is observed when the banks present detailed methodologies in their reporting, but they remain an opacity testifying of a lack rigor and/or transparency on one or two aspects at most of the method adopted (selection of issues, panel, representativeness, etc.). We analyze our findings in the light of the conceptual framework of Neo-Institutional Theory.

Keywords: Extra-financial materiality; Decoupling practices; Cooperative banks; matrices; Neo-institutional theory. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-09-19
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05531554v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in INTANGIBLES, SUSTAINABILITY, AND VALUE CREATION : REPORTING, MANAGEMENT, AND GOVERNANCE, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management (EIASM), Sep 2024, Grenoble, France

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05531554v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05531554

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().