The Call for a Systemic Shift Towards a Circular Society: A Systematic Literature Review

Anne-Claire Savy ()
Additional contact information
Anne-Claire Savy: MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School, UM - Université de Montpellier, LGTO - Laboratoire de Gestion et des Transitions Organisationnelles - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse, Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse, ADEME - Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Énergie

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Abstract Following the recent call for a systemic shift towards sustainability, we present a systemic literature review conducted via the StArt tool and informed by over 105 articles in order to understand the nature and extent of a multidisciplinary literature on the systemic organising of the circular economy (CE). The findings show a large academic community occasionally addressing this management issue. Primarily composed of engineers and managers, they have published their findings, often as co-authors, in a few multidisciplinary engineering journals. The systemic CE organising issue is mainly problematised as the tools required, changes in organisation of the value chain, and reliance on key actors. However, little has been written about the conceptualisation or systemic evaluation of the impacts. Contributions show a split between the major conventional trend that focuses on CE for sustainable growth by optimising tools, actors' roles, and the organising system, and a minor but critical trend that explores reflections on conceptualisation and evaluation, opening up avenues for territorial, complex, and ecological thinking for a transformational circular society. A reminder of Boulding's systemic, sustainable, and stationary CE reveals three important points: (1) the literature we reviewed is largely analytical rather than systemic; (2) it is mainly limited to an incompatible economic growth logic and lack of awareness of complexity issues; and (3) the need for cooperation, information sharing, and interdisciplinarity clearly appear as common issues to be addressed.

Date: 2026-02-25
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2026, 6 (2), pp.51. ⟨10.1007/s43615-026-00805-6⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05547927

DOI: 10.1007/s43615-026-00805-6

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().