“Decoding ambiguity”: Asian elephants’ (Elephas maximus) use previous experiences and sensory information to make decisions regarding ambiguity

Sagarika Phalke, Cécile Sarabian, Alice Catherine Hughes and Hannah S. Mumby
Additional contact information
Sagarika Phalke: Unknown
Cécile Sarabian: IAST - Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse
Alice Catherine Hughes: Unknown
Hannah S. Mumby: Unknown

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Animals rely on sensory information from the environment to make optimal decisions. However, animals are often faced with incomplete or ambiguous information. Some species use sensory information and previous experiences to generate expectations about ambiguity. To test this, we used a cognitive bias test experimentally modified for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) to investigate how they respond to ambiguous cues after positive (rewarded) and negative (unrewarded) experiences. We manipulated the degree of ambiguity by associating the spatial position and colour of the cues to either previously experienced positive or negative experiences. We demonstrate that elephants use previous experiences, and the valence (affective value) attached to those experiences to make decisions regarding ambiguity. Elephants show a positive bias by opening the ambiguous positive box three times as often and twice as quickly compared to the negative cue. Conversely, they are less likely to open and slower to respond to the ambiguous negative cue. These results are consistent with responses of farm animals and captive wild mammals when faced with unconditioned ambiguous cues with perceptual overlaps. Our findings indicate that when making decisions under ambiguity, animals rely on cognitive and sensory mechanisms. A greater understanding of decision-making mechanisms could aid in understanding animals' responses to their immediate environment with potential implications for conservation and welfare.

Keywords: Animal welfare; Decision-making; Colour; Spatial; Elephant behavior; Choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2025, vol. 283 (n° 106525), ⟨10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106525⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05553849

DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106525

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().