Compensate at your own risk Heterogeneity in compliance with preventive behaviors through the lens of economic and social preferences

Antoine Lacombe () and Marlène Guillon
Additional contact information
Antoine Lacombe: AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, SESSTIM - U1252 INSERM - Aix Marseille Univ - UMR 259 IRD - Sciences Economiques et Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Marlène Guillon: MRE - Montpellier Recherche en Economie - UM - Université de Montpellier, FERDI - Fondation pour les Etudes et Recherches sur le Développement International

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Preventive behaviors are crucial for controlling the spread of infectious diseases. Until now, most of the literature on the understanding of the willingness to comply with preventive behaviors at the individual level has focused on either one of those behaviors or studied several behaviors but independently. However, preventive behaviors might not be independent of each other, and the question of the relationship between these various behaviors deserves to be further investigated. The COVID-19 pandemic represents an interesting setting to study compliance with preventive behaviors when several prophylactic measures aiming to reduce the same infection risk are available. The aim of this study is to investigate how economic and social preferences may shape the relationship between three types of COVID-19 preventive behaviors among a representative sample of the French population: 1) compliance with restrictions on movement, 2) adherence to barrier gestures and 3) COVID-19 testing. Using a Latent Class Analysis, we identify four groups of individuals with diverging patterns of compliance with preventive behaviors, differing both in terms of intensity and types of prophylactic measures followed: individuals who apply all preventive behaviors, those who reject them all, individuals who do not respect restrictions on movement but still protect themselves and others by applying barrier gestures, and those who do not use barrier gestures but comply with restrictions on movement. Our results support the existence of a risk compensation process leading some individuals to tailor their menu of preventive behaviors until they reach the risk threshold they are willing to handle. The composition of the menu of preventive behaviors appears to be linked with individuals' economic and social preferences including risk and time preferences, prosociality, and interpersonal trust. Exploring heterogeneity in preventive behaviors may inform the design of targeted prevention and communication campaigns that are better tailored to achieve public health goals.

Keywords: Infectious diseases; Economic and social preferences; Latent class analysis; Risk compensation; Preventive behaviors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-03-17
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05559341v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Journal of Health Economics and Management, 2026, 26 (1), pp.6. ⟨10.1007/s10754-026-09409-x⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05559341

DOI: 10.1007/s10754-026-09409-x

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().