EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Decent work among European early career researchers

Isabelle Skakni (), Jonas Masdonati, Inge van der Weijden, Bastien Bernela (), Katerina Machovcova, Katarína Baňasová, Andrea Galimberti and Nimrod Levin
Additional contact information
Isabelle Skakni: HES-SO - Haute École spécialisée de Suisse occidentale = HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland = Fachhochschule Westschweiz [Schweiz], UNIL - Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne
Jonas Masdonati: UNIL - Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne, CePCO - Centre de recherche en psychologie du conseil et de l’orientation - UNIL - Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne
Inge van der Weijden: CWTS - Centre for Science and Technology Studies [Leiden] - Universiteit Leiden = Leiden University
Bastien Bernela: LéP [Poitiers] - Laboratoire d'économie de Poitiers [UR 13822] - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers
Katerina Machovcova: CAS - Czech Academy of Sciences [Prague]
Katarína Baňasová: UKF - Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra
Andrea Galimberti: POLIMI - Politecnico di Milano [Milan], UNIMIB - Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca = University of Milano-Bicocca
Nimrod Levin: UNIL - Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne, CePCO - Centre de recherche en psychologie du conseil et de l’orientation - UNIL - Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose - Whereas the precarious nature of research careers is well-established, how this reality affects the subjective work experiences of early career researchers (ECRs) remains underexplored. To contribute to the growing literature on how academia impacts ECRs' lives and well-being, this paper aims to examine this issue through the lens of decent work. Design/methodology/approach - The authors surveyed 520 European ECRs, assessing their perceived decent work through five indicators: safe working conditions, access to health care, adequate compensation, free time and rest and complementary values. They tested whether ECRs' perceived decent work was associated with the meaning they ascribed to work and, using mediation analyses, how life satisfaction and meaning in work articulated as outcomes of their perceived decent work. Findings - Although no significant differences were found between academic stages (doctoral/postdoctoral), women tended to view their working conditions as less safe than men. The only cross-country difference concerned adequate compensation. Respondents' perceptions of decent work were also linked to their work meaningfulness and life satisfaction, underlying that a job perceived as decent contributes to ECRs' quality of life and work fulfilment. Practical implications - The findings suggest that universities should pay attention to three aspects of ECRs' work situation that shape their perceptions of holding decent jobs: adequate compensation for their work, congruence between personal/family values and those of their institutions and safe working conditions. Originality/value - This study adds to the global conversation about the challenges facing ECRs in today's academic labour market by applying the decent work concept to ECRs for the first time, thereby offering new insights into how this population perceives its working conditions.

Keywords: Decent work; Meaningful work; Early career researchers; PhD student; PhD graduate; Postdocs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-06-19
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 2025, ⟨10.1108/SGPE-10-2024-0113⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05559518

DOI: 10.1108/SGPE-10-2024-0113

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-03-31
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05559518