Town and/or country: Adam Smith’s rhetorics of 'natural progress of opulence'

Ecem Okan ()
Additional contact information
Ecem Okan: IDEA - Interdisciplinarité dans les Etudes Anglophones - Interdisciplinarity in English Studies - UL - Université de Lorraine, UL - Université de Lorraine

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The brief history of Europe after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the Wealth of Nations (1776) has received due attention. What makes this account noteworthy is, on the one hand, the causal links Smith forges between a series of historical developments —and attributes to David Hume—pertaining to the rise and fall of feudal system and the emergence of modern European states; and on the other hand, his argument that Europe had not followed the "natural progress of opulence" (WN III.i): its progress had been inverted and retarded—which deflects him away from Hume—due to historical circumstances which had favoured the town at the expense of the country. Building on his Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres and Essays on Philosophical Subjects, the present paper shows that there are sufficient grounds to argue that Smith constructs this paradox as a rhetorical device: (i) the inverted presentation of history creates emotional unease in readers thereby requiring a theoretical explanation, (ii) which Smith provides in the simplest and most satisfactory manner possible in his historical account. (iii) The resulting motivational power of theoretical beauty reflects Smith's attempt to foster reform —withdrawal of policies that benefit either the town or the country (iv) The resulting admiration for theoretical beauty helps, in turn, to distract readers' attention away from appreciating the fact that it was the mercantile system, Smith's prime adversary, that made possible unprecedented liberty, wealth and progress.

Date: 2024-05-30
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 63ème Congrès de la Société d'anglicistes de l'enseignement supérieur (SAES), May 2024, Nancy, France

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05563197

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().