Insolubility as a goal: Joint U-I labs for sustaining paradoxes towards Pasteur-like research

Elise Lagasse (), Quentin Plantec, Pascal Le Masson () and Benoit Weil ()
Additional contact information
Elise Lagasse: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Quentin Plantec: TBS - Toulouse Business School
Pascal Le Masson: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Benoit Weil: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: University–industry collaborations (UICs) are increasingly promoted to foster innovation, yet existing research largely treats the tensions they generate as problems to be mitigated or resolved through alignment, proximity, or transfer-oriented governance. Drawing on paradox theory, this paper reconceptualizes UIC tensions as enduring paradoxes that must be actively sustained to support Pasteur-like, use-inspired research. We examine joint university–industry laboratories (JUILs) as organizational arrangements designed to maintain the simultaneous presence of academic and industrial logics. Based on a qualitative study of 13 JUILs supported by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), drawing on 46 interviews and 117 secondary sources, we identify governance mechanisms that institutionalize the four interrelated paradoxes: belonging, performing, organizing, and learning; through dual academic–industrial leadership, shared but revisable research agendas, mutual proposal and veto rights, standardized intellectual property frameworks, bounded autonomy, or iterative steering processes aligned with doctoral research cycles. By mobilizing paradox theory in the context of UICs, the paper shifts attention from tension resolution toward the governance of insolubility, showing how JUILs operate as Pasteur-like research settings beyond technology-transfer logics while satisfying both academic and industrial stakeholders.

Keywords: Pasteur-like research; University-Industry collaboration; Joint UI labs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-07-31
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 86th Annual Meeting Academy of Management conference (AOM), Jul 2026, Philadelphie (USA), France

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05572603

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().