Human resource measurement and reporting in manufacturing and service sectors in Sri Lanka

Vathsala Wickramasinghe () and N. Fonseka
Additional contact information
Vathsala Wickramasinghe: University of Moratuwa
N. Fonseka: University of Moratuwa

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose- To explore and compare current practice of the measurement and reporting of human resource information by firms belonging to the manufacturing and service sectors in Sri Lanka. Design/methodology/approach- Survey methodology was used and 30 firms belonging to the manufacturing and service sectors responded. For the data analysis descriptive statistics, chi-square test, principle component factor analysis and independent sample t-test were used. Findings- There were sectoral differences in reporting some of the human resource indicators. Human resource indicators were mainly collated internally and a limited number of indicators were externally disclosed. A majority of firms, irrespective of the business sector, maintained records of human resource indicators in the manual form. Three main factors that inhibit the measurement and reporting of human resource were identified as "Insufficient resource allocation", "Lack of knowledge in human resource measurement and reporting", and "Negative impact on organization". Research limitations/implications- The research was conducted using survey research methodology as a pilot study to establish baseline data and to be a source of general guidance in stimulating future research. Practical implications- The findings suggested that firms need to have more effective systems in the measurement and reporting of human resource. Originality/value- The majority of past studies on the measurement and reporting of human resource were conducted on the voluntary disclosure of information in annual reports, firms were selected on the basis of the market capitalization, and data were analysed using content analysis. Yet, the literature suggests that the content analysis of disclosed annual report information is mainly based on a non-random sample of firms and many firms do not disclose all the available information. The current empirical survey-based study explored and compared human resource measurement and reporting practices of firms belonging to the manufacturing and service sectors in Sri Lanka.

Keywords: data-driven decision making; strategic human resource management; efficiency analysis; HR reporting systems; benchmarking; human capital management; productivity measurement; organizational performance; performance measurement; human capital reporting; workforce analytics; disclosure; human resource reporting; HR analytics; HR metrics; human resource measurement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05594428v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 2012, 16 (3), pp.235 - 252. ⟨10.1108/14013381211286388⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05594428v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05594428

DOI: 10.1108/14013381211286388

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().