Utility-Consistent Valuation Schemes for the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment of Life Insurance Companies
Olivier Le Courtois (),
Mohamed Majri and
Li Shen
Additional contact information
Olivier Le Courtois: EM - EMLyon Business School
Li Shen: EM - EMLyon Business School
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
In this paper, we construct new valuation schemes for the liabilities and economic capital of insurance companies. Specifically, we first build a ‘SAHARA' valuation framework based on Symmetric Asymptotic Hyperbolic Absolute Risk Aversion utility functions. Then, we construct a ‘SAHARA-CPT' framework that incorporates the previous utility function as a value function and that is based on Cumulative Prospect Theory. The process used for assessing a life insurance company's own funds consists in replacing the market-consistent parametrization with a utility-consistent parametrization that accounts for the risk aversion of the market and the long-term duration of the company's commitments. Our illustrations show that this approach leads to a lower value of the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment and to a lower volatility of own funds. The framework that is based on cumulative prospect theory has the advantage over the expected utility theory framework that it considers a precautionary overweighting of extreme events, as a tradeoff for additional model complexity.
Keywords: overall solvency needs; expected utility theory; cumulative prospect theory; ORSA; market-consistent; SAHARA-CPT; SAHARA; own funds; Fair value; best estimate of liabilities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in APJRI, Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2021, 15 (1), pp.47 - 79. ⟨10.1515/apjri-2019-0047⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05606685
DOI: 10.1515/apjri-2019-0047
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().