Beyond the medals: an experimental analysis of consumer preferences for wines judged by experts

Magalie Dubois, Juliette Passebois-Ducros (), Yilong Liang, Jean-Marie Cardebat, Laithier Julien and Michel Visalli ()
Additional contact information
Magalie Dubois: BSB - Burgundy School of Business (BSB) - Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Dijon Bourgogne (ESC)
Juliette Passebois-Ducros: IRGO - Institut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - UB - Université de Bordeaux - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Bordeaux
Yilong Liang: IRGO - Institut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - UB - Université de Bordeaux - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Bordeaux, UCL - Université catholique de Lille
Jean-Marie Cardebat: BSE - Bordeaux sciences économiques - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Laithier Julien: Winespace
Michel Visalli: CSGA - Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation [Dijon] - UB - Université de Bourgogne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Dijon - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, INRAE, PROBE Research Infrastructure, Plateforme Chemosens [Dijon] - CSGA - Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation [Dijon] - UB - Université de Bourgogne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Dijon - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between professional expert judgments and consumer utility in a market characterized by high information asymmetry: the wine industry. This study investigates whether consumers' intrinsic preferences, elicited under unbiased conditions, align with professional expert classifications. While previous literature investigates the role of expert ratings and medals as quality signals influencing consumer choice, existing studies mainly focus on wines that remain within the competitive ranking system. This paper contributes to this literature by explicitly incorporating wines that are excluded from expert certification, namely, wines disqualified from competitions due to major sensory flaws. This paper accessed confidential data from a major wine competition to define three categories of wines (gold medal, non-medalists and wine disqualified from the competition for major flaw) and conducted a lab experiment with 125 participants. In a blind tasting, participants evaluated wines from each category. This paper found a substantial divergence between professional expert judgments and consumer preferences, revealing that consumers largely fail to perceive, or are unconcerned by flaws that professional wine experts at an international wine competition consensually consider severe enough to be disqualifying. While wine professional experts appropriately act as market gatekeepers, the results reveal that expert-based quality signals may not consistently align with consumer hedonic valuation. This disconnect suggests that wines consensually deemed flawed by professional experts can nonetheless find commercial viability in the market, as these flaws are not necessarily disqualifying from a consumer perspective. It indicates a potential misallocation of resources in the wine market driven by professional expert opinion rather than consumer utility.

Keywords: Experimental economics; Information asymmetry; Expert judgement; Consumer preferences; Sensory evaluation; Blind tasting; Wine competition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-05-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Review of Behavioral Economics, 2026, pp.1-26. ⟨10.1108/rbe-12-2025-0236⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05618118

DOI: 10.1108/rbe-12-2025-0236

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().