EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

What moves the profitability of battery energy storage in the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland interconnection of the United States?

C. K. Woo, K. H. Cao, H. Qi (), Y. S. Cheng, I. Milstein, A. Tishler, J. Zarnikau and Y. Chen
Additional contact information
H. Qi: Audencia Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Applying a two-part methodology to a sample of daily observations in 2016–2024, we answer the question of what moves the profitability of battery energy storage (BES) in the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection (PJM) - the largest regional transmission organization of the United States. This question is real-world relevant and policy important because BES accelerates deep decarbonization by aiding an electric grid's reliability management under rising market penetration of variable renewable energy (VRE) generated by solar systems and wind farms. We find that when its capacity cost is $300 per kWh, a 50-MW lithium-ion system has a missing problem of insufficient investment incentive, as its annual operating profits from daily arbitraging of PJM's real-time energy price spreads are well below its annualized costs. When the capacity cost is $100 per kWh, the missing money problem still exists but greatly diminishes. As large-scale VRE development's merit order effect reduces PJM's real-time energy prices, solving the system's missing money problem requires revenues in addition to those from the system's daily discharge and cost reductions made possible by investment tax credits. However, the additional revenues may invite allegations of double paying BES owners because the hours of profit-maximizing discharge tend to coincide with the hours of high energy prices caused by PJM's dwindling operating reserves. Further, investment tax credits may be considered unnecessary because the BES market is highly competitive. We consider such allegations misguided, as electricity reliability and clean energy are public goods in an economy's quest for a sustainable future.

Keywords: Battery; energy; storageProfitabilityWholesale; electricity; competitionMissing; moneyVRE; developmentPJM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-07
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05629813v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Energe Storage, 2026, 165 (10 July 2026), pp.122256. ⟨10.1016/j.est.2026.122256⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05629813

DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2026.122256

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-07-07
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05629813