Facing prolonged uncertainty: how is forest planning evolving? Insights from the French state forests

Frédéric Bonin (), Meriem Fournier (), Benoît Grasser () and Myriam Legay ()
Additional contact information
Frédéric Bonin: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Meriem Fournier: SILVA - SILVA - AgroParisTech - UL - Université de Lorraine - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Benoît Grasser: CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine
Myriam Legay: SILVA - SILVA - AgroParisTech - UL - Université de Lorraine - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This study shows how climate change profoundly reshapes forest planning routines. Based on a French state forest case study, it demonstrates a shift from rigid, long-term planning toward adaptive planning built on shorter cycles, continuous monitoring through remote sensing, and renewed governance that strengthens coordination within forest administrations and with external stakeholders. Context: Climate change fundamentally challenges the foundations of traditional forest planning, which has long relied on stable ecological baselines, long-term predictability, and deterministic planning cycles. Increasing disturbances such as droughts, pests, and large-scale dieback undermine these assumptions and create conditions of prolonged uncertainty, rendering conventional planning increasingly ineffective. Aims: We explored how forest planners adapt their practices to cope with this prolonged uncertainty and provide emerging alternatives, through the theoretical framework of organizational routines to analyze both stability and change. Methods: We conducted an in-depth single-case study of a French state forest, combining interviews, field observations, and analysis of management documents. Using an abductive and processual approach, we traced the sequencing of actions, actors, and artifacts to understand how forest planning routines evolve in practice. Results: We identify three major shifts: the shortening of planning cycles to reduce long-term obsolescence; the integration of continuous monitoring enabled by remote sensing technologies; and the redesign of governance arrangements to enhance internal coordination and stakeholder engagement. Conclusion: Forest planning is transitioning from a fixed long-term roadmap toward an adaptive, continuously updated process designed to cope with persistent uncertainty.

Keywords: Forest planning; Monitoring; Organizational routine; Pattern; Prolonged uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-06-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-inv
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05642036v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Annals of Forest Science, In press, ⟨10.1186/s13595-026-01344-8⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05642036v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05642036

DOI: 10.1186/s13595-026-01344-8

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().