Have the environmental benefits of insect farming been overstated? A critical review

Corentin Biteau, Tom Bry-Chevalier, Dustin Crummett, Katrina Loewy, Ren Ryba and Michael St. Jules
Additional contact information
Corentin Biteau: The Insect Institut, Unit 204, Philadelphia
Tom Bry-Chevalier: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Chaire économie du climat - CEC - Chaire économie du climat
Dustin Crummett: The Insect Institut, Unit 204, Philadelphia
Katrina Loewy: The Insect Institut, Unit 204, Philadelphia
Ren Ryba: Anim Ask, Unit 10,Linen House,London
Michael St. Jules: The Insect Institut, Unit 204, Philadelphia

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Insect farming is frequently promoted as a sustainable food solution, yet current evidence challenges many environmental benefits claimed by industry proponents. This review critically examines the scientific foundation for assessing the environmental impacts of insect farming in both human food and animal feed applications. Our analysis reveals substantial limitations in existing research. Most studies have been conducted in small‐scale settings, which may not accurately reflect real‐world, industrial conditions. There are significant uncertainties, with many authors highlighting the fact that the future environmental impact of large‐scale insect production is unknown. This is especially true given claims that insects can be fed on food waste and that insect frass can be used as fertiliser, both of which have considerable challenges to overcome at scale. Furthermore, insect‐based foods predominantly substitute for plant products with limited environmental impact rather than meat, while evidence indicates that insect feed and pet food applications, when not utilising genuine food waste, generate greater environmental impacts than conventional alternatives. By providing a comprehensive overview, this review highlights key areas for further research and ensures policymakers have a clearer picture of the remaining uncertainties surrounding this emerging industry.

Keywords: Yellow mealworm; Life cycle assessment; Insect farming; Cricket; Circular economy; Black soldier fly (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-10-28
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Biological Reviews, 2025, 101 (1), pp.163-194. ⟨10.1111/brv.70076⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05650831

DOI: 10.1111/brv.70076

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().