From Risk Reporting to Resilience: A Narrative Integrative Review of Cybersecurity Governance Practices in Organizations
William Asare Yirenkyi,
Apaflo Godson Teye,
Matilda Konotey and
Yeboah Mary Magdalene
Additional contact information
William Asare Yirenkyi: Temple University, Fox School of Business, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Apaflo Godson Teye: University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.
Matilda Konotey: Temple University, Fox School of Business, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Yeboah Mary Magdalene: University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Cybersecurity has moved from a peripheral technical function to a core pillar of organizational governance, driven by the escalating frequency and cost of digital intrusions, tightening disclosure regulation, and growing recognition that technical controls alone cannot guarantee continuity of operations. This narrative integrative review synthesises contemporary academic literature on cybersecurity governance, tracing its evolution from a compliance-oriented, risk-reporting paradigm toward an integrated model of organizational cyber resilience. The review examines governance structures and board oversight arrangements, the integration of cybersecurity into enterprise risk management, the conceptual architecture of organizational cyber resilience, the human and cultural determinants of governance effectiveness, sector-specific and supply-chain vulnerabilities, financial and insurance mechanisms for risk transfer, the regulatory and standards landscape, and approaches to measuring governance maturity. Findings indicate that although disclosure obligations and formal oversight structures have proliferated, substantive board-level expertise remains scarce, enterprise risk management integration is uneven, and resilience-building efforts are frequently undermined by fragmented accountability and inconsistent measurement practices. The review argues that a durable shift from reactive risk reporting to genuine organizational resilience requires coherent alignment across governance structures, cultural investment, supply-chain oversight and outcome-based metrics. Directions for future research and the practical implications of these findings for boards, risk officers and regulators are discussed.
Date: 2026-07-20
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Asian Journal of Current Research, 2026, 11 (3), pp.233-248
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05699128
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().