Indiscriminate barriers: The trade effects of due diligence policies in global timber markets

Valentin Mathieu () and Clément Nedoncelle ()
Additional contact information
Valentin Mathieu: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Clément Nedoncelle: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper offers the first comprehensive assessment of the trade effects of due diligence policies (e.g., the U.S. Lacey Act and the EU Timber Regulation) which are motivated by concerns over illegal logging in global timber markets. We use a structural gravity model with global timber trade data from 2000 to 2021 to estimate the impact of these regulations, differentiating effects based on an exporter's risk profile and product type. We find that these policies act as a significant non-tariff barrier. Crucially, this deterrent effect is indiscriminate: we find no evidence that high-risk exporters are more constrained than compliant, low-risk exporters. This suggests that the substantial compliance costs and procedural barriers limit trade for all suppliers. We also show that these policies most strongly affect raw and lightly processed timber. Counterfactual simulations confirm that a risk-targeted policy–one that restricts due diligence obligations to high-risk exporters–could preserve overall trade volumes while effectively shifting sourcing away from risky suppliers. Our findings offer timely insights for global trade and environmental policy design, highlighting the need for refined, risk-calibrated mechanisms in emerging regulations such as the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR).

Keywords: International trade; Gravity model; Wood products; Illegal logging; Due diligence policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2027-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Ecological Economics, 2027, 251, pp.109184. ⟨10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109184⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05708088

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109184

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().