 Information assessment of hospital websites in Croatia: How to develop accountability standards?Évaluation de l'information sur les sites web des hôpitaux en Croatie: comment élaborer des normes de responsabilité ?Sanja Seljan (),
Maja Baretić (),
Marko Seljan and
Mirjana Pejić Bach
Post-Print from HAL Abstract: We evaluated websites from 28 state hospitals in Croatia. The analysis was performed using a Codebook including 89 items divided into five categories: Technical characteristics, Hospital information and facilities, Medical services, Interactive on-line services, and External activities.2 The aim was to score each website by identifying the presence or absence of the 89 items (1 = item found, 0 = item not found). The website evaluation score was calculated on the basis of the items satisfied and compared two subgroups of hospitals ranked according to Croatian Institute of Public Health (Group 1 included seven national and six county hospitals of regional importance and Group 2 included 12 county and 3 local hospitals).3 Hospitals from Group 2 had significantly less beds then those form Group 1 (P = .001), though there was no difference in bed occupancy. The overall median website score was 33.5 (11-48). There was no statistically significant difference in two subgroups regarding total hospital websites score, but statistical significance was present among two groups with regard to Hospital information and facilities (P = .038) and External facilities (P = .001). Total evaluation score pointed to poor quality of hospital websites in Croatia. There were two distinctive categories of web quality: Hospital information and facilities (items concerning general information, history of the hospital, location, ways of reaching hospital, contact details of public relations office, International Organization for Standardization (ISO) certification, patients' rights and obligations, complementary services) and External facilities (items concerning ability to obtain health information, job opportunities, list of conferences, presence in media, publications, existence of courses, studies, booklets for download). It seems that the category Hospital information and facilities depends more on personal engagement of web-master, but the category External facilities points that higher ranked hospitals (mostly academic ones) offer information beyond basic healthcare. As stated in the article, we refer to Reference 1, well-established online accountability practices will lead to public expectations on how a hospital should account for and justify its actions to various stakeholders. In Croatia, there is still no regulatory framework recommending accountability standards of hospital websites. We propose that standards for local and county hospitals website should provide concise and clear information and standards for highly specialized/academic hospitals should strive to provide also online accountability landscape. Date: 2020-03-30 Published in International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2020, 35 (4), pp.970-971. ⟨10.1002/hpm.2975⟩ There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05724120 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2975 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.