Rethinking Mindset in Careers: Meta-Mindset as a Meta-Competency

Peter A. Heslin and Lauren A. Keating ()
Additional contact information
Peter A. Heslin: UNSW - University of New South Wales [Sydney]
Lauren A. Keating: EM - EMLyon Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Mindsets refer to implicit beliefs about the extent to which the personal characteristics that shape behavior can be changed. Decades of theorizing and empirical research have focused on how holding a growth mindset tends to serve individuals better in their careers than a fixed mindset. Scholarship on the role of mindsets in career interests, development, and outcomes almost always culminates in calls to encourage individuals with a fixed mindset to adopt a growth mindset. In this conceptual paper, we advance three critiques of current careers scholarship on mindsets: its tendency to dichotomize mindsets as either fixed or growth, its ambiguity about whether mindsets are treated as stable traits or malleable states, and its neglect of the potential downsides of resolutely promoting growth mindsets. We discuss the relevance for the vocational behavior literature of the recent advent of mixed mindsets, the dual-process model of mindsets, and compensatory growth mindset messaging strategies for averting harm resulting from growth mindset interventions. We thereby reframe mindsets from a simplistic, panacea-like individual difference to a dynamic, contextually situated mental framework that individuals can—via the meta-mindset career meta-competency—reflect upon and deliberately nudge to shape how they engage with and experience their evolving careers. We conclude with implications for research, as well as for organizations, career counselors, and individuals engaged in their careers.

Keywords: Career scholarship; Career; Mindset; Career development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-07-31
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Academy of Management (AOM) Annual Meeting 86th, Jul 2026, Philadelphia, United States. ⟨10.5465/AMPROC.2026.10922abstract⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05724505

DOI: 10.5465/AMPROC.2026.10922abstract

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().