How can firms stop customer revenge? The effects of direct and indirect revenge on post-complaint responses

Yany Grégoire, Fateme Ghadami, Sandra Laporte (), Sylvain Sénécal and Denis Larocque
Additional contact information
Yany Grégoire: HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal
Fateme Ghadami: HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal
Sandra Laporte: HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal
Sylvain Sénécal: HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal
Denis Larocque: HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Do customers feel better or worse after enacting revenge? Using a multimethod approach, we show that customers' post-complaint desire for revenge depends on whether they initially use direct or indirect revenge behaviors (RBs). Specifically, the current research makes three contributions. First, we find that the more customers use direct RBs, the more pronounced is the decrease in their post desire for revenge over time, whereas a strong engagement in indirect RBs is associated with higher post desire for revenge over time. A series of experiments also indicate that direct RBs lead to less post desire for revenge and more positive affect, compared to the indirect RBs condition. Second, we document the process underlying each effect. The beneficial effect of direct RBs is explained by justice restoration, while the deleterious effect of indirect RBs is mainly explained by public exposure. Third, on the basis of our findings, we test different managerial tactics to reduce avengers' post desire for revenge. For direct avengers, recoveries with full or overcompensation substantially reduce their negative responses because these customers are primarily driven by justice restoration. For indirect avengers, our prescription involves taking initiatives to change their focus from public exposure to justice restoration by using proactive social media tools. This switch makes these latter customers more amenable to most recoveries, even poor ones.

Keywords: Post-complaint responses; Service recovery; Service failure; Brand transgression; Negative affect; Justice theory; Public exposure; Customer revenge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2018, vol. 46 (n° 4), pp.1052-1071

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05775738

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().