A true competitive advantage? Reflections on different epistemological approaches to strategy research

Rodolphe Durand () and Eero Vaara
Additional contact information
Rodolphe Durand: GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Traditionally, strategy scholars have paid too little attention to epistemological issues. To advance our understanding of these issues, we focus in this paper on the theory of truth underlying specific traditions in strategy research. We distinguish positivism, constructionism, scientific realism, and pragmatism as viable, but fundamentally different epistemological approaches. We argue that each of these approaches is based on a specific theory of truth. As a case in point, we concentrate on the notion of competitive advantage, and argue that each of the four approaches attributes a specific epistemological status to competitive advantage that should be taken seriously when conducting empirical research and interpreting research findings.

Keywords: truth; epistemology; strategy; competitive advantage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2006

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00125687

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().