SETTING NEW RULES FOR GOODWILL ACCOUNTING: THE BRITISHEXPERIENCE

Inès Bouden () and Rouba Chantiri Chaudemanche ()
Additional contact information
Inès Bouden: DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Rouba Chantiri Chaudemanche: DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyse the process of development of the standard relating to goodwill by the British Accounting Standards Board (ASB) (FRS 10, 1997) and more precisely to understand how and why the ASB came to favour a solution (capitalisation of goodwill with impairment tests) at odds with the existing regulations (capitalisation and systematic amortization). The first part of the paper provides an overview of the evolution of the national and international regulations on the subject. Although this "innovation" is generally attributed to the FASB, we point out the active role of the ASB. In the second part, a detailed description of the development of the standard-setting project on goodwill within the ASB is provided for the period 1991-1995, through interviews conducted with the project director. The results suggest that although this solution appeared early in the process, its acceptance was dependent on its practical feasibility. Moreover, its final adoption as a mere option within FRS 10 highlights the fact that it is not comfortable for a standard-setter to go against the mainstream.

Keywords: goodwill; impairment tests; innovation; standard-setting process; processus de normalisation comptable; tests d'impairment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 28ème congrès de l'Association Francophone de Comptabilité, May 2007, Poitiers, France. pp.1-20

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00151305

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().