How Accounting for Goodwill relies on Underlying Assumptions: a Historical Approach

Clemence Garcia ()
Additional contact information
Clemence Garcia: DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: For over 30 years, the role of accounting theory in standard setting has been contested in some countries. This article seeks to provide a better understanding of how theories and their basic assumptions give support to collective accounting choices. In this paper, we investigate major changes in goodwill accounting in the U.S. over the past century through a literature review. The research is aimed at showing how general assumptions on accounting govern most arguments produced in the debates.Four different treatments of goodwill have been classified depending on two major assumptions. Then, we analyzed whether the support given to each solution in the literature was consistent with these assumptions. Our findings show that there is a strong link between the dominant views on accounting and the way goodwill is accounted for in each sub-period.

Keywords: Goodwill; Accounting History (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-04-25
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in EAA Annual congress, Apr 2007, Lisbon, Portugal

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00169323

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().