Reported job satisfaction: What does it mean?

Louis Lévy-Garboua and Claude Montmarquette

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We emphasize the major influences of experienced utility gaps or regret, i.e. the difference between what happened and what might have happened, on job satisfaction. The main prediction that we test is that job satisfaction correlates with the wage gaps experienced in the past and present, holding other job-related satisfactions constant, with the possible exception of young workers. We further test that this effect of wage gaps on job satisfaction declines with working experience. We find evidence on a Canadian cross-section that the past matters.

Keywords: Job Satisfaction; experienced wage gaps (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-04
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00203197
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (45)

Published in The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2004, 33 (2), pp.135-151. ⟨10.1016/j.socec.2003.12.017⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00203197/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Reported job satisfaction: what does it mean? (2004)
Working Paper: Reported job satisfaction: What does it mean? (2004)
Working Paper: Reported Job Satisfaction: What Does It Mean? (1997)
Working Paper: Reported Job Satisfaction: What Does It Mean? (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00203197

DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2003.12.017

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().