Institution et justification. De la nécessité de distinguer deux conceptions de la justice

Bernard Billaudot
Additional contact information
Bernard Billaudot: LEPII - Laboratoire d'Economie de la Production et de l'Intégration Internationale - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Institution and justification, about the need to distinguish two conceptions of justice This paper deals with the place of the concept of justification in the processes of institutions in modern societies. A synthesis is proposed between Commons' transaction theory and Boltanski and Thevenot justification theory. This synthesis involves tearing down and re-building both of these theories with the help of the American philosopher MacIntyre, who distinguishes two general conceptions of justice: the first in terms of excellence, and the second in terms of efficient coordination.

Keywords: justifictation; transaction; ethics; law; institution; justice; éthique; modernité (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue Française de Socio-Economie, 2008, 1, pp.153-176

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00289041

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().