Floss firms, users and communities: a viable match?
Nicolas Jullien and
Jean-Benoit Zimmermann
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The participation of firms in Free/Libre/Open Source Software (FLOSS) communities is growing and is increasingly debated amongst scholars. As [41] explained, FLOSS needs profit and we do not know successfull floss products without firms in their ecosystem, either being via the financial support of foundations (Eclipse, Linux) or the commercial offering of products or services based on specific FLOSS products (SQL, RedHat). Various points of view have been proposed, but most of the time, scholars studied either the implication of firms within a community or the integration of floss into their market strategy, but not both. In this article, we plead for a more structured and global analysis, based on industrial economics tools, and thus starting from the basic conditions of the computer market and of the buyers' competence in software development (the 'dominant user's skill). This conceptual framework helps to distinguish the different roles (understood as 'social roles') firms may play in the FLOSS ecosystem and, specifically the variation in their involvement.
Keywords: 'Free'/'libre' or 'open source' software; Industrial economics; dominant user's skill; firms' roles; Free'/'libre' or 'open source' software (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ipr and nep-pr~
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00449535v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Published in Journal of innovation economics, 2011, 1 (7), pp.31-53. ⟨10.3917/jie.007.0031⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00449535v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Floss firms, users and communities: a viable match? (2011) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00449535
DOI: 10.3917/jie.007.0031
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().