RÉSISTANCE ET CONFUSION DANS L'HARMONIZATION DES NORMES COMPTABLES INTERNATIONALES: L'APPROCHE CHINOISE AUX FUSIONS ET ACQUISTIONS
Baker C. Richard,
Yuri Biondi and
Qiusheng Zhang
Additional contact information
Baker C. Richard: School of Business - Adelphi University
Qiusheng Zhang: SEM - School of Economics and Management [Beijing] - BJTU - Beijing Jiaotong University
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
This article focuses on the case of the China Accounting Standards Committee (CASC), which acted in 2006 to require the use of the "pooling of interests method" under certain circumstances when accounting for business combinations. In contrast, the pooling of interests method has been explicitly prohibited by the US Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) and the IASB. The paper discusses two principal issues. The first concerns the cultural and economic context of Chinese economic development which led the Chinese standards setters to adopt an approach to accounting for business combinations which differs from the IASB standard. The second deals with the role played by the understanding of the underlying economics of business combinations, which leads in turn to different representations of the combination process. The complexity of accounting for the industrial reorganization that is currently taking place in China has led to the realization that some business combinations are mergers and not acquisitions. This is a significant observation and one which is worthy of greater discussion and consideration by accounting standards setting bodies.
Keywords: business combinations; purchase method; pooling of interest method; merger; IASB; regroupement; méthode d'acquisition; méthode de mise en commun; fusion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-05-27
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00458944v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in La place de la dimension européenne dans la Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, May 2009, Strasbourg, France. pp.CD ROM
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00458944v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00458944
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().