EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Of similarities and divergences: why there is no continental ideal-type of "activation reforms"

Jean-Claude Barbier () and Matthias Knuth ()
Additional contact information
Jean-Claude Barbier: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Matthias Knuth: Institut für Soziologie - Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In matters of "activation of social protection" as in other policy areas, one would expect that three types of welfare regimes would be identifiable. However, with the hindsight of 20 years of the deployment of "activation strategies", it is still impossible to draw the stylized characters of a "Bismarckian" or " conservative-corporatist" type to compare with the Scandinavian and Liberal ones. In the domain, Germany and France have reformed, each with their own pace and timing, according to their institutional systems, systems of actors and political culture. They have much in common, but also persistent dissimilarities that can be ascribed to their long term history. The empirically detailed survey (from the 1960's) contributes to confirming that a "broad view" comparison leaves aside many crucial explanatory factors. It also shows the limits of an analysis in terms of welfare regimes, when it comes to explaining change and reform. Finally, both societies have implemented policies and reforms that have fostered an amazing fragmentation of situations, a much more complex situation that the simple opposition between "insiders" and "outsiders" is unable to capture, while it postulates a "dualization" of their social protection systems.

Keywords: Activating social protection; welfare; social protection; comparison France-Germany; Bismarckianism; welfare regimes; Régimes de protection sociale; Activation de la protection sociale; protection sociale; comparaison France-Allemagne; bismarckisme (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-10
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00542245
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2010

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00542245/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00542245

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00542245