Mandatory regulation versus discretionary regulation, unilateralism, and national treatment: an analysis of the United States - Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998 dispute

Christophe Charlier

Post-Print from HAL

Keywords: Mandatory regulation; discretionary regulation; unilateralism; national treatment; TRIPS; WTO; US-Section 211 Appropriations Act (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Carlos M. Correa. Research Handbook on the Interpretation and Enforcement of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules, Edward Elgar, pp.283-297, 2010, Research Handbooks on the WTO

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Chapter: Mandatory Regulation versus Discretionary Regulation, Unilateralism, and National Treatment: An Analysis of the United States – Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998 Dispute (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00542394

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().