Should the carbon price be the same in all countries ?

Antoine d'Autume (), Katheline Schubert and Cees Withagen
Additional contact information
Antoine d'Autume: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: International differences in fuel taxation are huge, and may be justified by different local negative externalities that taxes must correct, as well as by different preferences for public spending. In this context, should a worldwide unique carbon tax be added to these local taxes to correct the global warming externality ? We address this question in a second best framework à la Ramsey, where public goods have to be financed through distortionary taxation and the cost of public funds has to be weighted against the utility of public goods. We show that when lump-sum transfers between countries are allowed for, the second best tax on the polluting good may be decomposed into three parts : one, country specific, dealing with the local negative externality, a second one, country specific, dealing with the cost of public funds, and a third one, global, dealing with the global externality and which can be interpreted as the carbon price. Our main contribution is to show that the uniqueness of the carbon price should still hold in this second best framework. Nevertheless, if lump-sum transfers between governments are impossible to implement, international differentiation of the carbon price is the only way to take care of equity concerns.

Keywords: Pigovian taxation; Carbon price; second best; Pigovian taxation.; Prix du carbone; second rang; taxation pigouvienne. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-08
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00654239v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2011

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00654239v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Should the Carbon Price Be the Same in All Countries? (2016)
Working Paper: Should the Carbon Price Be the Same in All Countries? (2016)
Working Paper: Should the Carbon Price Be the Same in All Countries? (2016)
Working Paper: Should the Carbon Price Be the Same in All Countries? (2016)
Working Paper: Should the carbon price be the same in all countries ? (2011)
Working Paper: Should the carbon price be the same in all countries? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00654239

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().